The Soapbox

RML Hoos

Joined: 11/04/2004 Posts: 1833
Likes: 2054

What's this?

No it doesn’t. It’s now a completely neutral program.


Now the exact same rules apply for people using the tax advantaged scholarship at any private school, religious or not.

The state reg said you have to exclude religious schools which means the program was not neutral and it discriminated against religious schools merely because of their religious orientation.

The state does not have to have the program - but if they do, can’t exclude people from using it only because they will use it for a religious school.


(In response to this post by bballbill)

Posted: 06/30/2020 at 12:15PM


+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


75
Hide This

Current Thread:
 
  For those who prefer separation of church and state this ruling sucks! -- bballbill 06/30/2020 12:02PM
  I totally agree with this ruling. Excluding religious schools would be -- hoolstoptheheels 06/30/2020 1:06PM
  There was no need for a SCOTUS ruling. No harm. -- DanTheFan 06/30/2020 12:38PM
  Typical activism from Conservative Judges. ** -- Hoobedoobedoo 06/30/2020 12:42PM
  I agree with the ruling but the logical extension -- KCHoo 06/30/2020 12:33PM
  Mixed feelings - fair point in general but -- fishhoo 06/30/2020 1:33PM
  I agree. ** -- bballbill 06/30/2020 12:45PM
  This. If public schools aren’t where they should be don’t fund private ones ** -- WahooMatt05 06/30/2020 12:40PM
  No it doesn’t. It’s now a completely neutral program. -- RML Hoos 06/30/2020 12:15PM
  I'd be fine with it if they insisted on teaching all major religions -- HoosWillWin 06/30/2020 12:14PM
  Sorry, that's a ridiculous stipluation -- Faz d. Hoo 06/30/2020 12:19PM
  I can understand that decision. Solution: don’t fund private education. ** -- SixerHoo 06/30/2020 12:11PM
  As the ruling notes, they can certainly choose not to ** -- Faz d. Hoo 06/30/2020 12:16PM
  Completely agree. There's little rationale for it. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 06/30/2020 12:13PM
  Bingo...amazing that 4 justices disagreed ** -- Moneyshot 06/30/2020 12:12PM
  Muslims? Surely you jest... -- Beerman 06/30/2020 12:05PM
  There you go. ** -- Hoogle.com 06/30/2020 12:13PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307