The Soapbox

Hood

Joined: 08/14/1998 Posts: 2251
Likes: 2705


You once again need to read much more closely


The statute in question in that case affords taxpayers a privilege coextensive with the attorney client privilege. In other words, the court applied the rules of attorney client privilege to decide the taxpayer privilege case. And concluded that because client identities are not privileged in an attorney client privilege case, they are not privileged under the taxpayer privilege case.




(In response to this post by Sabremetrician)

Posted: 04/16/2018 at 5:24PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  Liberal NYC judge. ** -- ConnHoo 04/17/2018 1:36PM
  Today was the perfect example of an echo-chamber. ** -- psychobilly 04/16/2018 9:42PM
  I see Hannity played the bad guy in Billy Madison -- WahooMatt05 04/16/2018 4:25PM
  As noted below, that is incorrect (and silly). ** -- Sabremetrician 04/16/2018 3:39PM
  None of the cases he cited support what he says. ** -- Sabremetrician 04/16/2018 8:04PM
  Pretty much describes Hood in this case. ** -- Sabremetrician 04/16/2018 8:02PM
  No, you are wrong -- Hood 04/16/2018 3:52PM
  That makes oh-for-three on your legal support ** -- Sabremetrician 04/16/2018 4:36PM
  Third case: -- Sabremetrician 04/16/2018 4:28PM
  You once again need to read much more closely -- Hood 04/16/2018 5:24PM
  Ask Kimba Wood ** -- WaxHoo 04/16/2018 3:12PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307