you of what he actually said:

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said during a news conference here in an apparent reference to Mrs. Clinton’s deleted emails. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Emails that were on a server the FBI had. Emails you're now suggesting might be hiding elsewhere, but weren't turned over and/or shouldn't/couldn't be found by the FBI. Words you're now parsing to suggest were meant for different emails (and presumably think Hillary was once again stupid enough to have a new set of incriminating emails susceptible to hacking). All so you can claim he was telling them to spy on her, as if it's "fact", by giving them to a press that would reward them.

And just in case you forgot, what you guys are desperately trying to shift the "outrage" to, is hoo hacked the emails that simply exposed what the DNC, Podesta, Hillary, etc. were saying and doing. Gee, I wonder why you wouldn't want the focus to be on what they were saying and doing, but rather how they were exposed? Would you be less "outraged" if that hack was done by someone else instead of Russia? Maybe that 400# guy in mom's basement? How about someone like Fusion GPS, that then hired someone to contract with Russia to dig up that dirt? Would you be "outraged" then? So maybe it's not really just about "Russia attacking our democracy".