admit the truth, but no, that's not it at all. The transcript is transcribed at the time by 3 or more people sitting in the Situation Room listening to the call. They then compare their versions to make sure they have captured everything (since one person could easily miss something). IIRC, that compilation then has to also be approved by a supervisor before it becomes the official transcript. It cannot be called a word for word transcription because it is not recorded, and thus they cannot assure us that every single word was captured. That is what we saw.

To suggest it is just a summary, synopsis, or somehow could be "heavily edited" to have any substantive omissions is either ignorant or a blatant lie.

As for your point about it being moved to a more secure server, a) that has been done for other phone call transcripts besides this one as routine practice, b) was likely started for security reasons after the two early calls with Australia and Mexico were "leaked" as would be prudent, and c) has nothing to do with the creating of the transcript at all.

I will grant you that, if somehow your fantasy land conspiracy theory were true, and that what we saw was noticeably different than the actual transcript, that would be game, set and match in terms of impeachment. I would suggest you not hold your breath grasping at that straw.