The Soapbox

Blah

Joined: 08/31/2001 Posts: 31759
Likes: 49037


This was known in the original complaint. Do we even need ...


this whistleblower? Much of what he/she said was proven. Now there is a second whistleblower with first hand information.

The road map was already given. The whistleblower proved credible.

If you want to harp on a procedural issue, Schiff shouldn't have said "we" didnt meet with the whistleblower before he saw the complaint. It's now known a Schiff staffer directed the whistleblower to the appropriate IG. That's standard procedure. Republicans on do the same thing. However, Schiff shouldn't have misled the public. That said, Trumo does it all the time. Both Schiff and Trump have to deal with that ... but doesn't change the underlying investigation.

(In response to this post by JMHoo)

Posted: 10/09/2019 at 12:47AM



+4

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  When? China? LOL. ** -- hoothat 10/09/2019 10:29AM
  Nm** -- HokieDan95 10/09/2019 08:39AM
  Its a distraction. Nothing more. ** -- HoosQ 10/09/2019 08:02AM
  Dip dip dip, there is a second, the summary of -- 111Balz 10/09/2019 06:39AM
  Summary ** -- HiwasseeHoo 10/09/2019 06:12AM
  Summary ** -- HiwasseeHoo 10/09/2019 06:13AM
  Nm** -- JMHoo 10/08/2019 10:39PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307