I have no problem with your post of that article before...
My problem, as I stated then, was governments and news using modeled "worst case scenarios" to make radical and costly policy.
The worst case, again...as I stated then, was an impossibility, because some of the factors for improvement were simple hand washing, minor distancing, etc....things that people were already doing, thus making the worst case moot already. Yet, policy makers and dumb as dog shit talking heads kept the hysteria going. The world burns...talking heads still make a buck through clicks and hysteria. And anyone who claims to be an expert is usually anything but. Real experts don't use the word "expert."
And now to top it off, this modeled data was poorly modeled and should have assumed the virus was more wide spread, thus having a higher denominator in projecting the mortality rate.
But my intent was not to rake you over the coals, fwiw....not on this, at least :)
|
(
In response to this post by WahooMatt05)
Posted: 03/26/2020 at 2:35PM