intention of reading a lengthy article to find the snippet you claimed supported your own assertion, that if it was there as you claimed, you could easily point to that snippet to defend your own claim. Of course you never did. B) Afterwards, when I told you I read every word and it wasn't there, even someone as dense as you should've easily recognized that was 1) sarcasm and 2) a further challenge for you to provide that snippet you claimed was there. Once again, you never did.

But if you're still obviously struggling with the difference between a voter requesting an absentee ballot, and a mass mailing of those applications, or worse, ballots, to every name on a poorly purged voter roll, it should surprise no one that you would also struggle to follow the simple concept above.

Now please explain to all of us what "for three years" means, and how that wouldn't also cover your time here.