constitution with the 2A. You clearly don't have even a base understanding of either.

If you don't like Whitmer's executive order, that's you're prerogative. File a lawsuit as others did and let the Courts decide if she exceeded her authority under the state constitution. I asked Klanny Boy if he supported the intimidation tactics of his fellow white nationalists who showed up to the state house carrying assault weapons. That's not protesting, that's intimidation. And the 2A gives you no such right, so not sure why you keep bringing it up (other than the obvious fact that you don't know much of anything about it).

The 2A give BLM protestors the right to own the same guns, and all you creeps seem to have big problem with them employing the same tactics you support when it's your fellow white nationalists trying to intimidate a Democratic governor. You probably supported the subset of these goons who plotted to kidnap and execute her too, and it's not even that far a leap from the nonsense you're peddling in this thread.

My position is clear, dipshit, and was a very simple point. I don't support people strutting around with guns trying to intimidate others no matter what their political affiliation or cause. It wasn't that hard a point to follow, and I certainly didn't intend to be explaining the difference between two different constitutions to the village idiot, so I think I'll call it a day.