doesn't look like there's much there, certainly a veritable truckload less than Flynn's. To wit: Everybody at the FBI knew he represented the DNC and most knew he represented Hillary, and it's actually in the interview notes. Perkins Coie is a pretty well kn own firm and Sussman a pretty well kn own lawyer in it.

You might read Republican Congressional cross examination of James Baker on this very point, in which he admits what he knew and equivocates on what he possibly didn't know, ditto. Here's a little excerpt from Liz Dye at Wonkette:

Indeed, as Politico notes, Reps. Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan openly sneered at the idea that Sussman's partisan bona fides could have escaped Baker's notice when he appeared before the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees in October 2018.

"Did you know when he was giving this information did you know he was working for — that he did extensive work for the DNC and the Clinton campaign?" Jordan demanded.

"I am not sure what I knew about that at the time," Baker replied.

"You knew what his career was," Meadows hammered. "And you knew generally speaking that he had some involvement with the Democratic National Committee." (He slipped that time and said "Democratic." Mostly Meadows refers to it as the "Democrat National Committee," because he's a dick.)

And Baker conceded that he did, because, hello, DC ain't that big.

While Baker and Jordan were pursuing a theory that Baker was part of a Deep State Democrat conspiracy with Sussman to frame poor, innocent Donald Trump, Durham has taken the opposite position. In the special counsel's telling, Sussman pulled one over on Baker by hiding the fact that his real client was the Clinton campaign.