The Soapbox

hoolstoptheheels

Joined: 01/04/2001 Posts: 27029
Likes: 34306


According to an article in the WSJ the idea is to add parameters to limit


The accounts that would be covered by this requirement, although I don’t think details of that have been released. It theoretically would not apply to all accounts. The idea is to try to capture reporting on accounts of wealthier folks who have large inflows and outflows not reported on W2s and 1099s.

I understand the desire for repubs to go on the attack, but I think this is still a WIP. I give odds of no better than 50/50 that anything like this will make it into the bill (not that I have any inside knowledge, just think it’s controversial). If it does, details will emerge about the scope of the requirement, but it is apparently not intended to cover the average working joe.

Again, it all seems in flux, so I suppose all accounts being covered is a possibility if they decide alternatives are too complex. Although that also might torpedo the whole provision.
[Post edited by hoolstoptheheels at 10/20/2021 08:39AM]

(In response to this post by JMHoo)

Posted: 10/20/2021 at 08:33AM



+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  Put it down, Tommy.... -- TomGlansAski 10/20/2021 09:28AM
  Please keep your sick fantasies to yourself ** -- HokieDan95 10/20/2021 09:02AM
  It's always projection with MountainQ. ** -- Hoodafan 10/20/2021 09:56AM
  It’s cuz izza sick libbrul fuck, yawl! ** -- WahooRQ 10/20/2021 10:02AM
  You misspelled creepy. ** -- Hoodafan 10/20/2021 10:01AM
  It's what xe does. ** -- ResistHoo 10/20/2021 09:06AM
  You Soapbox righties are a weird bunch, man -- Fuzzy Dunlop 10/20/2021 08:42AM
  How did I know this would end in "that's different"? -- ResistHoo 10/20/2021 09:11AM
  I'm sorry you're so easily confused. -- ResistHoo 10/20/2021 09:25AM
  Please elaborate bookkeeper. ** -- Blah 10/20/2021 10:11AM
  You're neither willing nor capable of understanding.** -- ResistHoo 10/20/2021 10:34AM
  You get laid yet? ** -- Blah 10/20/2021 10:54AM
  My point exactly - thanks, Blah!!! ** -- ResistHoo 10/20/2021 10:56AM
  No? ** -- Blah 10/20/2021 10:57AM
  Please carry on with your usual idiocy, usual idiot. -- ResistHoo 10/20/2021 11:08AM
  You angry? ** -- Blah 10/20/2021 11:09AM
  Did you get laid yet? ** -- Blah 10/20/2021 08:35AM
  You got any EVUDENSE? -- WaxHoo 10/20/2021 08:31AM
  So we need evidence for legislation now?!?!? ** -- ResistHoo 10/20/2021 09:02AM
  No evidence = no evidence -- DTsBicep 10/20/2021 08:20AM
  Yes it does ** -- 111Balz 10/20/2021 09:04AM
  Check the article I linked below ** -- 111Balz 10/20/2021 09:10AM
  Plus they changed it back to $10k already I think. ** -- BocaHoo91 10/20/2021 07:53AM
  I thought Trump fixed the IRS? LMAO. ** -- DTsBicep 10/20/2021 08:21AM
  Wow. Just wow. ** -- Hoodafan 10/20/2021 08:48AM
  LOL! ** -- Hoodafan 10/20/2021 09:51AM
  No, you idiot. Read TK’s stoopid post ** -- WaxHoo 10/20/2021 07:29AM
  What bill? ** -- Newt 10/20/2021 07:20AM
  Link -- JMHoo 10/20/2021 07:47AM
  The more you post links the more moronic I feel -- DTsBicep 10/20/2021 09:47AM
  That article has passed its expiration date. ** -- SixerHoo 10/20/2021 08:51AM
  21 hours ago (link) -- JMHoo 10/20/2021 09:46AM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307