What is it you think they did? The paragraph that remains under the

"ePPP" heading specifically references on "gain-of-function", and if I were one to see conspiracies when reading about stuff I don't fully understand, THAT would be the paragraph I would focus on. Not the paragraph that generically defines "gain-of-function"

But I'm sure you and Jeremy Redfern are on to something. Keep up the good fight

(In response to this post by JMHoo)

Posted: 10/23/2021 at 08:09AM

PREV REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

Now, why would NIH do this? Hmm -- JMHoo 10/22/2021 11:33PM

What is it you think they did? The paragraph that remains under the -- BocaHoo91 10/23/2021 08:09AM