The Soapbox

Los Angeles Hoo

Joined: 03/05/2014 Posts: 19521
Likes: 29751


I think his implication is that...


...there are many dangerous and contagious health conditions out there, so 1) why mandate protection against one and not the others, and, 2) if you can mandate against one, then what's to stop the government from doing anything else it wants? Perfectly valid questions that (further) expose the politicization of COVID.

But that aside, as I think you and I agreed yesterday, the relative danger of such conditions should be irrelevant to the question of Constitutionality around the mandate.

(In response to this post by Seattle .Hoo)

Posted: 01/10/2022 at 1:35PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Mystery solved over recent Gorsuch kerfuffle… -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/10/2022 11:32AM
  I think his implication is that... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/10/2022 1:35PM
  Noooooooooooooooo! ** -- Hoodafan 01/10/2022 11:45AM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307