The Soapbox

Lazarus

Joined: 07/05/2002 Posts: 12179
Likes: 23092


Then again Pete Doocy did better than this chick ...


Things got awkward a few times at Wednesday’s press briefing, but never more than when Ms. Psaki used one of her most well-known tactics on Ms. Burke — derailing a question with questions of her own — to cringe-worthy effect.

MS. BURKE: Just a quick question on inflation. Many people believe that government spending is a big factor in the current inflation levels. Can you speak to concerns that spending plans that come out of Build Back Better aren’t paid for and — so could mean higher deficits and more inflation in the future?

MS. PSAKI: Aren’t paid for?

MS. BURKE: Right.

MS. PSAKI: Build Back Better is paid for.

Long pause while Ms Burke looks confused.

MS. BURKE: Can —

MS. PSAKI: Entirely.

MS. BURKE: Okay. Can you speak to the concerns that are coming in that it’s not actually —

MS. PSAKI: Who are the concerns from, though? But who’s saying it’s not paid for?

Another long pause as panic sets in for Ms. Burke.

MS. PSAKI: Because there have been a range of economists saying it’s entirely paid for, and that has been a priority for the President.

It has also been concluded by a number of Nobel laureates and experts — from a range of economic experts on the outside that it will not contribute to inflation.

Burke stares off into space thinking - Why am I here?

So those are the global experts that we would point to. But there may be others suggesting something else, but I don’t know who those people are.

Burke recovered slightly from there, getting Psaki to concede that Build Back Better would increase taxes on “the highest-income Americans” and “companies” by asking them to pay “a little bit more.”

“So they’re also not expected to contribute to future inflation then?” Burke asked.

“The Build Back Better Bill?” Psaki asked.

Burke knew the answer to this one: “Correct.”

With big “Per my previous email” energy, Psaki replied “Again, it’s fully paid for. We would point to Nobel laureates and a range of global economists who have conveyed that it would not contribute to inflationary pressures.”

Courtesy Mediate

People are saying that time will take care of people like me.

(In response to this post by TomGlansAski)

Posted: 01/27/2022 at 2:59PM



+3

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Ole Pete Doocy is a hoot. -- Lazarus 01/27/2022 2:04PM
  He is good ** -- Mr Wahoo 01/27/2022 2:58PM
  Sure they did. Go back the the Q fever swamps. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 01/27/2022 3:21PM
  In 2020. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 01/27/2022 3:13PM
  To Pravda he smart. ** -- Lazarus 01/27/2022 3:00PM
  “Conservative”? LMAO ** -- HoodatB 01/27/2022 4:09PM
  Using WH press briefings to sow seeds ** -- Hoo TV 01/27/2022 2:28PM
  Psaki drops a Doocy at every press conference ** -- TomGlansAski 01/27/2022 2:27PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307