And one that you of all people would argue 180 degrees differently if it were the dems being investigated under exactly these circumstances.

First off, you immediately traffic in your own variety of "fake news" when you say there is 0 evidence of Russian involvement, when the director of the FBI said plainly that their involvement wasn't even particularly well hidden. Comey is not a card carrying liberal (in fact as you know he's spent considerable time in their doghouse), nor is he a member of the media.

As for what Trump did, I have no idea. I didn't say it was under investigation. Comey did. I personally hope there is nothing to it, but I also believe that we do need to know what did happen and how best to mitigate it going forward. Just like with Hill's server issues, "under investigation" does not mean convicted or even accused of anything. Why wouldn't you want to get to the bottom of it, other than your apparent concern for the well being of the repubs and the Trump admin rather than the country as a whole?

Sorry man, but there are as yet undiscovered tribes deep in the Amazon who know without question that you'd be screaming that Hill were a traitor if there were even less reason to think she may have colluded with a foreign power to benefit her campaign.

And then of course you just draw blanket conclusions about the makeup of the staffs of these agencies, and of the inability of any "lefty" to have discipline, dignity, etc regarding following rules of confidentiality and whatnot.

In other words, your post is pure partisan hackery of the highest order and could be the perfect emblem of how not to approach something that has become this serious (in large part thanks to the baseless bullshit Trump decided to spew on Twitter a couple of weekends back).
[Post edited by hoolstoptheheels at 03/21/2017 1:09PM]