The Soapbox

WahooRQ

Joined: 04/30/2006 Posts: 44693
Likes: 60784

What's this?

And for Christ's sake, it's a surveillance warrant. The bar is deliberately


on the low side. It's almost as if people think you need to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt before you can get approved to keep an eye on someone that is suspected of conspiring with foreign agents. That just isn't how it works ... the point of surveillance is to see if there may be conduct that warrants further investigation and possibly charges. The fact that there is oversight at all by a federal judge (in this case, four different judges) is usually enough.

This narrative is just ridiculous -- if they referenced a Dossier, then it's a DEEP STATE CONSPIRACY and anything they found out by watching Page and Papadopolous should be suppressed, Mueller should be fired, and Trump should be free of this harrassment so he can MAGA!

Unless you're a muslim who may have relatives in Pakistan or Yemem -- then of course completely warrantless wiretap are A-OK! Freedom, baby!


(In response to this post by KCHoo)

Posted: 02/02/2018 at 5:28PM


+2

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


75
Hide This

Current Thread:
 
  Another question for the boards lawyers. -- Cold Hoober Hoo 02/02/2018 4:58PM
  Nunes’ memo just got dumber -- WahooMatt05 02/02/2018 5:12PM
  If that’s the case I would question the process of getting -- Cold Hoober Hoo 02/02/2018 5:17PM
  To add, note that your line about McCabe saying that they couldn’t get the -- KCHoo 02/02/2018 5:24PM
  So you’re saying the dossier provided enough additional evidence -- Cold Hoober Hoo 02/02/2018 5:30PM
  Not evidence. Concern. ** -- HokieDelNorte 02/02/2018 8:56PM
  Sought -- Beerman 02/02/2018 5:52PM
  That makes decent sense to me. And I may have -- Cold Hoober Hoo 02/02/2018 6:07PM
  I appreciate that you are asking questions and seem to really want -- 111Balz 02/02/2018 10:26PM
  With all due respect, that is a big assumption from you. You -- Cold Hoober Hoo 02/02/2018 10:54PM
  Is there anything in trump's history that would suggest -- 111Balz 02/02/2018 11:02PM
  Jr. is my guess or the son in law ** -- Cold Hoober Hoo 02/02/2018 11:11PM
  I’m not saying anything. I just restated the quote of what McCabe -- KCHoo 02/02/2018 5:44PM
  Why. The system assumes some level of good faith by the prosecutor/LE -- KCHoo 02/02/2018 5:20PM
  And for Christ's sake, it's a surveillance warrant. The bar is deliberately -- WahooRQ 02/02/2018 5:28PM
  The bar is deliberately on the low side? -- hoothat 02/02/2018 11:36PM
  That’s why I am asking questions. I don’t operate in that -- Cold Hoober Hoo 02/02/2018 5:37PM
  There are people a LOT smarter then you who disagree & I dont mean me ** -- Wahoo Ron 02/02/2018 5:35PM
  “Then you.” Sigh. ** -- hooyorkcity 02/02/2018 5:54PM
  Get confused by the Onion again, gramps? ** -- WahooRQ 02/02/2018 5:53PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307