I agree with this, which is the primary reason I opposed Kavanaugh, or for -- Seattle .Hoo 10/06/2018 2:45PMInsert a Link
Enter the title of the link here:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
|
Current Thread:
|
I agree with this, which is the primary reason I opposed Kavanaugh, or for -- Seattle .Hoo 10/06/2018 2:45PM Laughable ** -- CA Cav 10/06/2018 1:38PM No subtantive response? Follow your cult of personality ** -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 6:36PM Vox lmao ** -- jackethoo 10/06/2018 12:40PM Another person with no substantive response ** -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 6:37PM Seperated at birth? -- hoothat 10/06/2018 7:27PM Not me man. Seems like the Trumpists on this board have an MO that -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 7:31PM Uh huh -- hoothat 10/06/2018 7:34PM Please state your views on the counter-majoritarian difficulty and the -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 7:37PM Yes, you started with a false premise -- hoothat 10/06/2018 7:44PM So you don’t see how the counter-majoritarian difficulty is relevant in -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 7:46PM No. No I don't -- hoothat 10/06/2018 7:58PM Of course. But Courts should only be able to actually overturn laws that -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 8:09PM And them caring will matter how? ** -- hoothat 10/06/2018 8:12PM He’s just here to say dumb shit and drink some beer....and it looks like -- WahooRQ 10/06/2018 7:41PM Hey troll, how you doing? -- hoothat 10/06/2018 7:49PM Slow night on the fry line? -- WahooRQ 10/06/2018 7:52PM Humorless? -- hoothat 10/06/2018 8:00PM Thanks for taking the time to post that. -- jackethoo 10/06/2018 7:17PM My original post was an argument...you have offered nothing. ** -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 7:26PM Lol Vox ** -- SokurHoo83 10/06/2018 12:16PM And a third...geez. So many people are clueless. But Kavanaugh! #winning ** -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 6:38PM While surfing the far-left chanels , I came across a rant on MSNBC -- Wahoo Ron 10/06/2018 12:08PM They ARE undemocratic. -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 6:42PM Rough day, huh? ** -- hoothat 10/06/2018 7:29PM Pretty good day actually. Personally. Not for the country ** -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 7:33PM Not for the country? Debatable. ** -- hoothat 10/06/2018 7:36PM Bravo. Just revealed the mysteries of the universe. People disagree on -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 7:38PM Now, with that in mind -- hoothat 10/06/2018 8:09PM For the second time in one thread, hoothat has proven that people disagree. -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 8:10PM Nevermind. -- hoothat 10/06/2018 8:16PM LMAO ** -- Hoogle.com 10/06/2018 12:49PM Same people are 0% concerned that the folks in NY State outside of NYC -- CharlestonSC 10/06/2018 12:37PM See...every state in the union practically. The divide is increasingly -- Seattle .Hoo 10/06/2018 2:43PM Yeah I mean I know you could go round and round forever on that one -- CharlestonSC 10/06/2018 4:31PM Generally it does. Voter suppression is a much bigger concern for me. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 10/06/2018 4:58PM A. You guess wrong. Staten Island in NYC is an R stronghold. -- HowieT3 10/06/2018 1:15PM We can have fun with numbers. -- hooshouse 10/06/2018 1:11PM Lets stay home in the commonwealth from this past November(link) -- hooshouse 10/06/2018 1:41PM Lose by 10% statewide and retain control? Surprised spread was that big ** -- CavMan1 10/06/2018 3:19PM Being saying for months the right’s real endgame is a new Lochner Era. ** -- WahooRQ 10/06/2018 11:40AM I won't get into Vox's legal analysis, which is downright shaky. You can -- Doug 10/06/2018 10:39AM Lolz. Sorry that vox actually presented the issues. Call it shaky legal -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 6:56PM Then I suppose you're totally copasetic if Congress regulates abortion -- Doug 10/06/2018 9:31PM There is no way to even respond to this post. -- BonsackHoo 10/07/2018 08:14AM If that's the case, you will need to write a book, you're going to need to -- Doug 10/07/2018 09:43AM So lets get this straight... -- BonsackHoo 10/07/2018 09:52AM I just didn't think much of the article and it's superficial legal -- Doug 10/07/2018 12:38PM Everyone is clueless but you, got it. -- hoothat 10/06/2018 7:30PM Well an argument is won when no one makes a substantive ciritique of it ** -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 7:33PM When one starts their rebuttal with an insult -- hoothat 10/06/2018 7:36PM An insult was justified after talking about vox’s “shaky” legal analysis. -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 7:39PM Lol, I didn't know the rules. -- hoothat 10/06/2018 7:45PM You are actually probably right that I was too short. But I don’t have -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 7:49PM Dude, Get off that horse -- hoothat 10/06/2018 7:51PM #Winning ** -- BonsackHoo 10/06/2018 7:52PM Is that what you call today's result? Good. ** -- Doug 10/06/2018 9:47PM Dude clearly needs a victory -- hoothat 10/06/2018 10:00PM Whaatever you need to tell yourself ** -- hoothat 10/06/2018 9:06PM Yes, the right is against "judicial activism." I guess that's why money now -- Seattle .Hoo 10/06/2018 2:47PM I've never considered spending itself to be an issue. Limits strike me as -- Hoo05Dave 10/06/2018 4:35PM I'm going to disagree with you there. Money has indeed driven elections in -- Seattle .Hoo 10/06/2018 4:56PM What does that have to do with my post? ** -- Doug 10/06/2018 3:25PM You seemed to conflate substantive due process cases with the SCOTUS -- WahooRQ 10/06/2018 6:57PM You're reading waaay more into my post than is there. For the most part, I -- Doug 10/06/2018 9:44PM You're the one who mentioned Roe v. Wade. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 10/06/2018 3:44PM Oh, something like that, just poorly articulated, so I must guess. Well, my -- Doug 10/06/2018 9:24PM