"Another factor complicating the FBI's assessment of the Steele election reporting was the Primary Sub-source's statement to the FBI that he/she believed that information presented as fact in the reporting included his/her and Steele's "analytical conclusions" and "analytical judgments," and not just reporting from sub-sources. For example, Report 80 provides that:
Speaking separately in June 2016, Source B (the former top-level Russian intelligence officer) asserted that TRUMP's unorthodox behavior in Russia over the years had provided the authorities there with enough embarrassing material on the now Republican presidential
candidate to be able to blackmail him if they so wished.

The Primary Sub-source told the FBI that "the ability to blackmail Trump was
[the sub-source's] 'logical conclusion' rather than reporting," even though it is
presented as a statement from a sub-source. " (Page 189)

So, hang your hat on the fact that your orange hero's behavior led an objective source to come to the logical conclusion that he could be blackmailed by our primary enemy and one that had already attempted to influence our election.

READ THE REPORT!!! Not just cherry-picked excerpts from your favorite silo. THERE IS NOTHING IN THE REPORT THAT ATTEMPTS TO DISPUTE THAT FACT that sources came to a logical conclusion that our primary adversary can BLACKMAIL our president!! To anyone's knowledge, that has never happened before, and none of the minions of orange seem at all concerned about it. That is why "the libs" are so incredulous. The same party that used to think TALKING to Cuba was crazy now thinks being buds with Putin and Kim Jong-un is great.