But that's not germane to the conversation. I'm a small government guy and I hold government (including law enforcement) to exceptionally high standards. I know that some people disagree with me about how high those standards should be, and that is their prerogative. Rather than debate those differences, let's keep this about the facts. A citizen was killed by agents of the government who were investigating two other citizens. Neither of those two citizens were in the Ms. Taylor's home at the time, and the police were aware of this.

There were no drugs or evidence of other illegal activity in the apartment (excluding the evidence associated with charges filed against Hankison).

The US Postal Inspector of Louisville publicly denied assertions made in the warrant about their involvement, going so far as to say they had monitored packages (at the request of another agency) going to the home and found nothing suspicious. I don't know if fabricating corroboration on a search warrant is a crime, but a reasonable person could argue it taints the veracity of the entire warrant. To be more inflammatory, fabricating corroboration to obtain a search warrant is a stupid game.

So, I ask again, what stupid game do we actually have evidence that *she* (not her ex-boyfriend) playing?