...it's always a tell that you're just going to mischaracterize what someone said. What I said was that there are tens of millions of people who as of right now think this election was stolen -- about half the country actually. (And before you say those people are just dumb-fuck right-wingers, keep in mind that you side still thinks Putin stole the 2016 election.) They are going to keep on saying that unless contrary evidence is presented. That is not good. If we really want to move on with a more unified country, this needs to be resolved.

A great form of contrary evidence is for all of Trump's claims to be shown to be meritless -- meaning he's got nothing and it's all bluster. That doesn't mean that the Dems need to prove that there was not malfeasance. At this point, the burden of proof is on Trump, not the Dems. If he gets 5-10 swings at the plate with these lawsuits and whiffs on every one, then that is a major plus for everyone.

I'm a Trump supporter, as you know, and I'm open to either side being right about what happened. I want it to play out. If Trump's got nothing, I want to know that, and vice versa. I don't think this is a controversial position.
[Post edited by Los Angeles Hoo at 11/09/2020 2:45PM]