Obviously, you could be right. They might not take the case -- my point was that at least an appear would reach that far.

I think where you might be wrong is on the vote count. If election laws were provably broken, then that could invalidate the elections right there. As just one example, IF IF IF Rep monitors were unlawfully denied access to watch the count, then that could void the election right there.

How can one prove fraud/error if one is not allowed to monitor the process? And, if you have no ability to prove fraud/error, then you also have no ability to prove election integrity, and there's no assumption thereof. In fact, denying that access would be indicative of malfeasance, not integrity.

So, it will be an interesting case study to see exactly what burden of proof is required here. I feel like the USSC fired a pre-election warning shot over PA regarding the mail-ins, and so that's the most likely place where we might see continued USSC involvement.