whaddabout is of course, to point out the absurdity and hypocrisy in a post such as that one found in the OP, laughably ignoring the past 4 yrs, while calling out others acting "like babies". As such, upon recalibration and further review, I am confident that you will find my original whaddabout was quite well done, and directly on point. Despite the obvious poll bias, massive oversampling of loony lefties here, and obvious HDS found here, my original and clearly on point whaddabout is registering a solid 4 on the whaddabout scale.

Now the accusation of a whaddabout however, carries an entirely different effort and burden of judgement. Said accusation is clearly intended as a lame dismissal and deflection technique, particularly when deployed against a solid whaddabout, in a desperate desire to ignore the solid analogy of said whaddabout because said behavior brought out by that whaddabout is clearly indefensible. As such, the whaddabout accusation "defense" needs to be judge by an entirely different scale than your standard whaddaboutometer.

Now it appears you are trying to "move the goal posts" from said lame whaddabout accusation to a whaddabout of your own. If you would like to direct us to the specific pages of this report showing the "evidence of collusion in plain sight" Shifty Schiff repeatedly claimed to have, or the resulting convictions for collusion from this report or elsewhere, we could all better evaluate your own whaddabout.

JMHO of course.