determine what is true and false and they absolutely claim that they do. This defendant committed a murder. True or false? This defendant defamed the plaintiff. True or false? This company discriminated against this class of people. True or false? This manufacturer violated these environmental regulations. True or false? Your risible assertion that they’re not in the true/false business stems entirely from the fact that they so often don’t confirm what YOU want to believe is true or false. Courts refuse to hear cases that lack standing because THERE IS NO CASE to hear. Texas can’t sue Pennsylvania over how Pennsylvania runs it’s elections, and the fact that Texas tried proves absolutely nothing other than that the salary of its attorney general is a waste of Texan taxpayers’ money. All that can be said of your final paragraph about numerous courts finding illegality “too late” is that it’s patently false as to illegality on any impactful scale. That case about the crooked Republican clerk in Colorado is pretty interesting though.
[Post edited by SixerHoo at 05/06/2022 5:17PM]