The Soapbox

111Balz

Joined: 08/13/1998 Posts: 59643
Likes: 57188


Every media account I have read has clearly said she raised


it for a new World Bank fund. So stop your silly victimization whining.

So how is this really any different than Hillary and Bill raising money for a fund they sponsored? It is well documented that they don't take money from their fund. So the benefit to them is the ego massage of having a successful fund under their name. If this WB fund that Ivanka proposed is successful, would she feel any different level of gratitude than the Clinton's felt? Why would this contribution not "buy them the same level of access to a president" as donations to the Clinton fund?

(In response to this post by HoosGuy)

Posted: 05/22/2017 at 08:32AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  No stamina (link) -- hooshouse 05/21/2017 7:24PM
  I don't believe it is Ivanka's "fund" per se -- HoosGuy 05/21/2017 6:02PM
  Exhibit 627 of blatant media bias -- HoosGuy 05/21/2017 11:19PM
  ...and then there was silence ** -- 111Balz 05/23/2017 10:12AM
  Does seem misleading. ** -- KCHoo 05/21/2017 9:38PM
  You guys are really on a roll today -- dajoka004 05/21/2017 3:51PM
  There is literally nothing he can do right. -- HoosGuy 05/21/2017 4:23PM
  It's hilarious. -- Hokieesith 05/21/2017 4:12PM
  I didn't spend 8 years nitpicking anything -- dajoka004 05/21/2017 4:03PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307