The Soapbox

Joined: 09/29/2013 Posts: 60530
Likes: 56985

What's this?

Exactly. I can understand concern being valid here, but has there been

any actual evidence that rates, occupancy, etc. has gone up disproportionately, or that any policies have been altered because of foreign agents benefiting the Trump family? Not saying it can't happen, and shouldn't be watched or worried about, just that the only thing of note I've seen, beyond speculation, was Mar-A-Lago upping their initiation fee. And don't recall seeing if any of those higher fees were paid for by foreign interests.

Very different than some of the allegations we saw wrt the Clinton Foundation in terms of Haiti rebuild, UBS, etc.

Maybe the Trumps can just delete all records and claim they only dealt with yoga classes and weddings that were booked. :-)

(In response to this post by Tuckahokie)

Posted: 06/12/2017 at 11:42AM

PREV NEXT REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

This one is for you, Balz -- Exhoolate 06/12/2017 10:44AM

Copy paste -- HokieDan95 06/12/2017 12:01PM

Emoluments clause historically refers only to salary from employment (link) -- JMHoo 06/12/2017 11:25AM

Your excerpt doesn't discuss the Emoluments Clause -- KCHoo 06/12/2017 11:59AM

If you read the whole article it ties it together. -- JMHoo 06/12/2017 12:44PM

Yes, liberals are dumb on this one. But, cut them slack. -- ryno hoo 06/12/2017 11:45AM

I'm not an attorney nor do I play one on TV, but I'm curious -- Hokie5150 06/12/2017 11:11AM

Reading about it, it seems that they are going to argue that -- KCHoo 06/12/2017 12:05PM

That would be an interesting case. If he is as unpopular as this board -- ESHooFan 06/12/2017 12:28PM

Not from foreign governments. There have been reports -- KCHoo 06/12/2017 12:35PM

I am out of Wash Post page views. Who are they suing -- Trump -- KCHoo 06/12/2017 11:19AM

FYI clearing your cookies resets the count so you can see it again. ** -- Hoodafan 06/12/2017 11:24AM

Incognito on chrome works as well ** -- HoosGuy 06/12/2017 11:56AM

You are a hero to those who do not want to see Democracy Die in Darkness -- ryno hoo 06/12/2017 11:41AM

LOL! But TBF I surely have no desire to add to WaPo's hits, and it's -- Hoodafan 06/12/2017 11:50AM

Welp...one out 12 DC residents are attorneys, so ergo...lawsuits ** -- Tuckahokie 06/12/2017 11:16AM

Yes, the chief ethics officers for Obama (cited in the article) and Bush, -- 111Balz 06/12/2017 10:55AM

This is where my cynicism is highest. All the "pay for play" screeching -- HoosWillWin 06/12/2017 11:12AM

And "current president" vs what a former prez did after he was prez ** -- 111Balz 06/12/2017 11:53AM

Is Trump able to double his room rates like Bubba doubled his speaking fees -- Tuckahokie 06/12/2017 11:26AM

Exactly. I can understand concern being valid here, but has there been -- Hoodafan 06/12/2017 11:42AM

Case looks like it's a large nothing burger -- HoosGuy 06/12/2017 12:09PM

It's pretty easy to measure impact ** -- 111Balz 06/12/2017 12:41PM

LOL! And I guess the taxpayer subsidies weren't enough of an advantage. ** -- Hoodafan 06/12/2017 12:17PM

"evidence that rates, occupancy, etc. has gone up disproportionately"? Yes -- 111Balz 06/12/2017 11:49AM

I'll wait for that actual evidence. But come on Balz, even you're not that -- Hoodafan 06/12/2017 11:56AM

See below on Mar-a-Lago. That is a place to start. But you had zero -- HoosWillWin 06/12/2017 1:08PM

I already acknowledged the Mar-A-Lago increase in this very thread. Could -- Hoodafan 06/12/2017 1:31PM

If I recall correctly, this was the location where they were advertising -- HoosWillWin 06/12/2017 1:35PM

I would not have called for a blind trust for the Hillary Hilton because it -- Hoodafan 06/12/2017 1:44PM

So, because it is hard to divest, it should be ok to set up potential -- HoosWillWin 06/12/2017 2:03PM

A blind trust does not force you to divest from anything, it only -- Hoodafan 06/12/2017 2:16PM

So your answer is yes. I understand that it is horribly complex, but -- HoosWillWin 06/12/2017 3:03PM

I made that distinction because unlike you, i actually read the -- 111Balz 06/12/2017 12:07PM

I'm sure that's the only reason why you rushed to the Clintons' defense. ** -- Hoodafan 06/12/2017 12:16PM

Please show me where i defended them. I simply suggested -- 111Balz 06/12/2017 12:38PM

You've never done anything but defend them. ** -- Hoodafan 06/12/2017 12:42PM

Okay gilligan, whatever you say ** -- 111Balz 06/12/2017 12:44PM

Please. Tell us more how Hillary was just sloppy and rightfully paranoid. ** -- Hoodafan 06/12/2017 1:00PM

Does doubling the Mar-a-lago membership fee count? -- WahooMatt05 06/12/2017 11:40AM

That is a start, and I see you have zero responses from Trump defenders. -- HoosWillWin 06/12/2017 1:06PM

In one case, a person is president. In the other he no longer -- 111Balz 06/12/2017 11:39AM

Balz may have to subscribe :>) ** -- Tuckahokie 06/12/2017 10:50AM

I did get blocked when I tried the link, but got to the article -- 111Balz 06/12/2017 10:55AM

Odd that you could do that for an article that you agree with but -- Hokie5150 06/12/2017 11:13AM

The only odd thing is your attempts at "reasoning". -- 111Balz 06/12/2017 11:45AM

I, like 111Balz, could not get to below article -- VaTechie 06/12/2017 11:17AM

Me either. And clearly not because Balzie and I are simpatico. :-) ** -- Hoodafan 06/12/2017 11:22AM

Nor could I ** -- HoozOnTop 06/12/2017 11:54AM