The Soapbox

hoolstoptheheels

Joined: 01/04/2001 Posts: 27070
Likes: 34355


Are you concerned that Flynn won't have access to competent counsel?


If lawyers can easily show the taint in the evidence then he has nothing to worry about. Of course, given the treasure trove of stuff apparently taken from his home, you and I have no idea what evidence is real and what evidence isn't, and what was damning and what wasn't.

Morrell seems to be saying that leaks are evidence of blind political anti-Trump bias. If the source of the leaks is the CIA, it could be people leaking to the press because they believe Trump's policies are disastrous. Which is not to defend the leaking, it is just to continue to say that there is no "Deep State" in rogue employees feeling such distress over policies that they go to the press.

Leaks have dogged every aspect of the Trump White House. Either more than other admins, or just more prominently because the Don is so incredibly sensitive to any criticism. It isn't just the CIA and it isn't just foreign policy matters. It's down as far as rumors about cabinet members calling him an idiot. Supposedly one of Kelly's jobs was to stop the admin from leaking on itself.

This is all indicative of a highly dysfunctional administration, not a deep state.

(In response to this post by HoosGuy)

Posted: 12/13/2017 at 3:45PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  A peak into The Deep State ** -- Tuckahokie 12/13/2017 11:45AM
  "The Deep State". That's a great piece of Bannonism. -- hoolstoptheheels 12/13/2017 11:50AM
  Ok. None of which supports any notion of a "Deep State". -- hoolstoptheheels 12/13/2017 12:13PM
  Sure. They didn't make it. They just made it famous. ** -- hoolstoptheheels 12/13/2017 2:10PM
  ...says one of the whipped ** -- 111Balz 12/13/2017 10:09PM
  It is more of an observation than a theory. -- Chuck Taylor 12/13/2017 1:54PM
  What's suspicious? I'd say the agent is clearly biased. -- hoolstoptheheels 12/13/2017 12:50PM
  I mentioned none of those things ** -- HokieDan95 12/13/2017 12:54PM
  Which is why much of my post was phrased as a question. -- hoolstoptheheels 12/13/2017 1:00PM
  I'm having a little trouble following you here -- HoosGuy 12/13/2017 2:37PM
  Oh, so it's about re-investigating Hillary on the email server. -- hoolstoptheheels 12/13/2017 2:56PM
  Mainly yes -- HoosGuy 12/13/2017 3:07PM
  Lol -- hoothat 12/13/2017 3:47PM
  What about that do you find funny? ** -- 111Balz 12/13/2017 4:15PM
  Not trolling. Laughing. -- hoothat 12/13/2017 4:23PM
  Did you actually read what I wrote? smh ** -- 111Balz 12/13/2017 5:21PM
  Yeah, I did. That's why I was laughing. ** -- hoothat 12/13/2017 5:29PM
  Wasn't trolling. -- hoothat 12/13/2017 6:19PM
  You're jumping to a lot of conclusions -- HoosGuy 12/13/2017 3:43PM
  Been some resistance and there's been some support. -- hoolstoptheheels 12/13/2017 12:42PM
  I remember when the email thing was going on -- VaTechie 12/13/2017 12:06PM
  Paybacks are hell - See The Starr commission. ** -- walkthecorner 12/13/2017 12:05PM
  Noooooooooooooooo!!!!! ** -- TomGlansAski 12/13/2017 11:42AM
  Hmmmm..... -- Hood 12/13/2017 11:36AM
  Whoa! You got 'em now. ** -- WaxHoo 12/13/2017 11:35AM
  For what? ** -- HokieDan95 12/13/2017 12:30PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307