It doesn’t have to be premeditated under that charge.

It had to be with the intent to kill. How can you shoot someone intentionally in the back without an intent to kill. That’s what shooting someone is meant to do. She wasn’t firing in the air and hit him accidentally.

In response to this post by Hokie5150

Posted: 03/15/2018 at 8:31PM

Found not guilty(link) -- hooshouse 03/15/2018 12:07PM

If first degree murder was the only option they presented to the jury, I -- Hokie5150 03/15/2018 12:30PM

It doesn’t have to be premeditated under that charge. -- KCHoo 03/15/2018 8:31PM

Having the right charges can be crucial. I once defended a man -- NJHoo 03/15/2018 2:21PM

What's the punishment for sleeping on duty? ** -- SokurHoo83 03/15/2018 2:32PM

If taken to a General Court Martial, the highest level -- NJHoo 03/15/2018 3:57PM

Awfully sleepy company there, NJ... ** -- southdenverhoo 03/15/2018 8:02PM

Batteries in an artillery battalion to be precise. -- NJHoo 03/15/2018 8:47PM

I wonder if they can try her for manslaughter if malice was what freed her ** -- WahooMatt05 03/15/2018 12:26PM

I don't see why that option wasn't on the table in the first place. ** -- Hokie5150 03/15/2018 12:33PM

Wouldn't that be double jeopardy? -- Beerman 03/15/2018 12:32PM

It would. Not sure why the judge didn’t let them include -- KCHoo 03/15/2018 8:32PM

It doesn’t have to be premeditated under that charge.

Insert a Link