So? What about other known non-Hoos here? Should we use that to just
dismiss rather than debate them? As if that says anything about them rather than us being unable to debate or defend our own positions. Not to mention it just feeds into the stereotype of Hoos being elitist snobby douchebags that just look down their noses at any non-Hoos (which sadly seems more earned, not given). Even if you ignore the laughability of it coming from a Highlander.
Or how about those Hoos that post over there constantly, but are just as negative, miserable and insulting/personally attacking to anyone that disagrees there as they are here? Does that volume make their posts more meaningful here? Or less negative and miserable?
And finally, again TK doesn't need me to defend him, but you may be perpetuating one of those false narratives that seems so popular with the lefties here. The one that TK is a racist. We all see the robo replies about TKKK, Klansanski, etc. And then when challenged, all you see are claims about history "over the years" and never the slightest facts to support those (vile) accusations. The closest I ever saw was someone say he called some black folks "thugs". Egads! I'm sure that was never said about Michael Vick or others on the sports boards. Sorry to break the news but being anti-illegal immigration doesn't make one automatically racist just because a large minority of them are "brown", unless you can point to his posts encouraging we let all those illegal Canadians slide. Once again, much like our Highlander, I don't think those throwing out those baseless vile accusations recognize those attacks say more about them than they do TK.
|
(
In response to this post by hooyorkcity)
Posted: 05/03/2018 at 1:34PM