The Soapbox

Joined: 11/11/2005 Posts: 8899
Likes: 15164

What's this?

That’s quite a perverse view of the report. How does one rationalize this

conclusion?

“We are deeply concerned that so many basic and fundamental errors were made by three separate, hand-picked investigative teams; on one of the most sensitive FBI investigations; after the matter had been briefed to the highest levels within the FBI; even though the information sought through use of FISA authority related so closely to an ongoing presidential campaign; and even though those involved with the investigation knew that their actions were likely to be subjected to close scrutiny. We believe this circumstance reflects a failure not just by those who prepared the FISA applications, but also by the managers and supervisors in the [investigation’s] chain of command, including FBI senior officials who were briefed as the investigation progressed.”

[Post edited by Hoos Operator at 12/10/2019 11:08AM]

(In response to this post by HoosQ)

Posted: 12/10/2019 at 11:06AM

PREV NEXT REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

Wow. This IG report is dense. Makes Mueller seem like a holiday special. -- HoosQ 12/10/2019 10:51AM

That’s quite a perverse view of the report. How does one rationalize this -- Hoos Operator 12/10/2019 11:06AM

Both sides have members who want to reign in the FISA process. Both sides -- hoojinks 12/10/2019 11:28AM

Yeh. I would love to see it SEVERELY reigned in or ended, but in this -- HoosQ 12/10/2019 12:14PM

Yes the report points out where the FBI either -- 111Balz 12/10/2019 11:20AM

In this case, the “mistakes” involved wiretapping innocent citizens based -- Hoos Operator 12/10/2019 11:29AM

LOL. You're worried about innocent citizens? You're the same poster ... -- Blah 12/10/2019 1:40PM

Innocent and false are YOUR assessments not the report's ** -- 111Balz 12/10/2019 11:30AM

Carter Page isn’t innocent? Where are the charges against him? ** -- JMHoo 12/10/2019 11:36AM

He sat at a table with Putin at a dinner in Russia -- WahooMatt05 12/10/2019 12:06PM

Sigh...as hoothat points out he was working for the CIA ** -- HokieDan95 12/10/2019 1:30PM

You have a source of him "working for" the CIA? I understand they had a -- hoojinks 12/10/2019 2:08PM

Good lord what a silly post ** -- TomKazanski 12/10/2019 2:36PM

What is silly about it? Understanding his relationship with the CIA seems -- hoojinks 12/10/2019 3:06PM

I’m talking about your so called distinction -- TomKazanski 12/10/2019 3:40PM

Nooooooooooo!!!!! He ate caviar. Wiretap that man. ** -- Hokieesith 12/10/2019 12:31PM

He was working with intelligence agencies... ** -- hoothat 12/10/2019 12:23PM

So you don't do wiretaps unless you already have -- HoosWillWin 12/10/2019 11:46AM

You sure as heck don’t continue a years worth of renewals ** -- TomKazanski 12/10/2019 12:49PM

And again as the report states, the dossier had information -- 111Balz 12/10/2019 11:50AM

Yes. As we know, this is all a diversion. The evidence against -- HoosWillWin 12/10/2019 11:55AM

The shit you believe. ** -- hoothat 12/10/2019 12:03PM

You're for wiretapping citizens based on rumors? -- hoothat 12/10/2019 11:50AM

You are just too stupid for a response. ** -- HoosWillWin 12/10/2019 11:53AM

Yet, you responded stupidly. ** -- hoothat 12/10/2019 11:55AM

I got it based on my own reading. I thought hearsay was evil?? ** -- HoosQ 12/10/2019 11:11AM

Huh? -- hoothat 12/10/2019 11:03AM

Might as well just be a doorstop, given the way it's being spun by the -- Hoo TV 12/10/2019 11:02AM

Heard Graham say he is interested in the fact they knew thee dossier was -- JMHoo 12/10/2019 11:00AM

Don't know where you/he get that the dossier was unreliable. That -- HoosQ 12/10/2019 11:11AM

Graham says from the time they interviewed primary sub-source 1. (Link) -- JMHoo 12/10/2019 11:20AM

All I can say is he must have read a different report than I did. ** -- HoosQ 12/10/2019 12:12PM

Graham lies for trump all the time ** -- 111Balz 12/10/2019 11:25AM

Did Gramsey go all vapors again? -- Shenhoo 12/10/2019 11:06AM

They DID NOT know it was unreliable then. Stop -- 111Balz 12/10/2019 11:02AM

Not true. The reports states that a Christopher Steele source told the FBI -- Hoos Operator 12/10/2019 11:26AM

I know what the report says. That does not make -- 111Balz 12/10/2019 11:28AM

LOL.. What did I say that was untrue? ** -- JMHoo 12/10/2019 11:29AM

See below ** -- 111Balz 12/10/2019 11:31AM

Take it up with the sr. Senator from South Carolina (link) -- JMHoo 12/10/2019 11:16AM

Did the sr. Senator go all hysterical again today? ** -- Shenhoo 12/10/2019 3:12PM

Because he's an honest broker. Lol ** -- wahoo138 12/10/2019 11:23AM

He's a multi faced cowardly POS. I was responding to what YOU said ** -- 111Balz 12/10/2019 11:22AM

Why so angry? I’m just reporting what Graham said. -- JMHoo 12/10/2019 11:27AM

No, YOU posted "the fact they knew the dossier was unreliable..." -- 111Balz 12/10/2019 11:29AM

They knew there were significant questions about the reliability of -- JMHoo 12/10/2019 11:33AM

Your words ** -- 111Balz 12/10/2019 11:40AM

Actually, if you had read my post below, you would know those are not my -- JMHoo 12/10/2019 11:44AM

Yes i read that yesterday. That still does not make what you -- 111Balz 12/10/2019 11:49AM

He didn't read it. ** -- hoothat 12/10/2019 11:48AM