Another example of a word that means something different in Trumpistanese than English.

The only pretending here is that anything like we saw post-2020 election, and particularly on Jan 6, had ever happened before. That’s a laughable fantasy.

We’ve never had virtually an entire party enslaved to its loser presidential candidate vote against certification in the January 6 ceremony that almost nobody ever even knew existed before 2021. We’ve never seen a a loser president insist that his Vice President simply refuse to certify the election when all electoral votes were fully certified and confirmed, with no finding in court to overturn them. Followed by a mob ginned up by the loser violently assaulting the Capitol and its outnumbered cops, calling for the death of the VP because he refused to bow to the loser/cult leader.

During which cult senators and congressional reps were sending out campaign contribution solicitations. It is truly mind numbing how much bullshit you are able to swallow without throwing up.

Nothing like this ever happened before. But I do think these pretzels you are twisting yourself into to try to make an unsupportable point (first it was about differences between defendants and plaintiffs, as though that makes any difference, since they both have to agree to be bound by the courts. That didn’t stick, so now it’s the fantasy that we’ve seen the aftermath of 2020 repeatedly in our history. So apparently “repeatedly” in Trumpistanese means “never” in English), are a very instructive highlight to your main point in this thread, and the one valid one that does stick:

The Biden Admin exhibits here the exact level of respect for the Judicial Branch that his office demands. The Trump Admin has always done the opposite, never more than in its 2020 coup attempt.