A post that gushes with the complete lack of it.

The question is whether the allegation I highlighted and the others in the complaint are true according to the evidence. That’s it. As a decades long participant in distressed debt markets, I could talk about the well known scumbaggery of Trump and his business. But I won’t, because I believe that to be as irrelevant as your opinion of Tish James. The only question is what the evidence here shows, which will be determined in court, unless the defendants decide to try to settle.

And the first paragraph is much the same - you wittingly or unwittingly admit that you’re ruled only by your political biases. You know, there really is no extra credit for being first to leap to conclusions. There is great potential for saying things that won’t age well once all facts are known.

You are exactly what you rail against the loudest here LA. The mirror image of it, so your biases are reversed, but exactly the same. All conclusions based upon your own hyper-biased view of the world. Not the facts and evidence around the specific thing in question. All supposition, all the time, based entirely on hyper-biased assessments of the players involved.

Very banana republic, I will give you that.