The Soapbox

Hoodafan

Joined: 09/29/2013 Posts: 60571
Likes: 57026


How magnanimous of you. How about drinkers? How about mountain climbers or


sky divers? Let's take that a step further. What about gay males that don't practice abstinence, or at least "safe sex"? What about poor folks that continue to live in high crime neighborhoods in a food desert situation where healthy foods are harder to come by?

See how slippery that slope can get when you try to rationalize regulating/punishing behavior? All of those things entail choices that arguably can lead to higher health care costs than if the opposite choice is made. Are you going to be as magnanimous with those groups too?

I don't mean to interrupt the divisive politics of bashing fatties and smokers in hopes of easing the acceptance of a single payer system, but there's a problem with all our sanctimony:

"It's a common enough argument around the world at the moment, that various unhealthy behaviours increase the costs to health care systems. Thus those unhealthy behaviours should be taxed more heavily so as to pay for the costs to those health care systems. The only problem with the argument is that it is entirely gibbering nonsense, unhealthy behaviours reduce costs to health care systems: if we are to accept the initial logic then we should subsidise them, not tax them."

"Although effective obesity prevention leads to a decrease in costs of obesity-related diseases, this decrease is offset by cost increases due to diseases unrelated to obesity in life-years gained. Obesity prevention may be an important and cost-effective way of improving public health, but it is not a cure for increasing health expenditures."

"The actual numbers for lifetime from 20 years old medical costs were:

The lifetime costs were in Euros:

Healthy: 281,000

Obese: 250,000

Smokers: 220,000"

"But the argument we cannot use is that these behaviours increase the costs of health care.

The reason we cannot use this argument is that it simply isn't true. Those who die young save health care systems money, not cost. Thus, if we really are to accept the argument about taxes and the costs of health care then we should be subsidising puffing, browsing and sluicing."


(In response to this post by 111Balz)

Link: To save healthcare $'s, die faster.


Posted: 10/19/2017 at 2:09PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  My Aunt in Ireland was refused Heart Surgery -- ConnHoo 10/19/2017 8:48PM
  I love this line from the column you linked -- 111Balz 10/19/2017 10:53AM
  That is actually an interesting argument from you -- 111Balz 10/19/2017 10:23PM
  From this - link -- 111Balz 10/19/2017 11:13AM
  I had a surgical disaster last year -- NJHoo 10/19/2017 11:19AM
  Nm** -- JMHoo 10/19/2017 11:19AM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307