The Soapbox

Hoo23

Joined: 10/28/2007 Posts: 685
Likes: 513


No, you are incorrect...


Article I, Section 8, clause 4 of the Con­stitution entrusts the federal legislative branch with the power to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.”

Since the Constitution was adopted, there have been numerous cases that tested various merits of whether this clause in the Constitution simply covers Naturalization or extends across various forms of immigration control. In each case, the decisions have supported the Federal Government's powers to control immigration on behalf of the States, and this was most recently conformed in the following 2012 case that went before the Supreme Court...

"The Government of the Unit­ed States has broad, undoubted power over the subject of immi­gration and the status of aliens. … This authority rests, in part, on the National Government’s con­stitutional power to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” U. S. Const., Art. I, §8, cl. 4, and its inherent power as sovereign to control and conduct relations with foreign nations…."

- Justice Kennedy 2012 decision in Arizona v. United States:

(In response to this post by hoolstoptheheels)

Posted: 03/13/2018 at 3:18PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Sanctuary Policies- creeping closer to -- Charleston Cav 03/13/2018 11:02AM
  Bullshit. But keep dreaming. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 03/13/2018 2:44PM
  Who in the hell would want this? -- hooshouse 03/13/2018 11:10AM
  I think Charleston once posted that he tried -- KCHoo 03/13/2018 12:55PM
  Ahhhh, no ** -- Charleston Cav 03/13/2018 1:24PM
  Can only guess how that interview went. -- WahooRQ 03/13/2018 1:03PM
  The Republic of Gilead ** -- WahooMatt05 03/13/2018 12:43PM
  You may be looking at this the wrong way House. -- Hoodafan 03/13/2018 11:17AM
  Yes ** -- Charleston Cav 03/13/2018 1:26PM
  Eisenhower did it. ** -- JMHoo 03/13/2018 1:16PM
  Kind of. The US Supreme Court and the lower -- KCHoo 03/13/2018 1:37PM
  Uhh, that is utterly wrong. In fact its the other way around. -- hoolstoptheheels 03/13/2018 11:43AM
  No, you are incorrect... -- Hoo23 03/13/2018 3:18PM
  You couldn't be more wrong ** -- Charleston Cav 03/13/2018 12:43PM
  You are correct, however a sanctuary city cannot -- Hoo23 03/13/2018 11:34PM
  Ok. Cool. So how about taking SF to court? -- hoolstoptheheels 03/13/2018 4:07PM
  Nm** -- Hoo23 03/13/2018 11:39PM
  There is also the Supremacy Clause -- Beerman 03/13/2018 1:11PM
  So the answer is, take them to court. Not some -- hoolstoptheheels 03/13/2018 1:24PM
  I'm not aware of any state looking to take anyone to court. -- hoolstoptheheels 03/13/2018 4:12PM
  Agree 100% -- Beerman 03/13/2018 1:29PM
  I believe you are looking for the 10th Amendment. -- hoolstoptheheels 03/13/2018 12:12PM
  Who's rooting for a military dictatorship? ** -- hoothat 03/13/2018 12:54PM
  Charleston ** -- hoolstoptheheels 03/13/2018 12:55PM
  Can't speak for him -- hoothat 03/13/2018 1:00PM
  Little Rock was enforcement of a court order. -- hoolstoptheheels 03/13/2018 1:36PM
  ...Was Lincoln a Military Dictator? -- hoothat 03/13/2018 1:09PM
  Ahh, only if they secede -- hoothat 03/13/2018 1:42PM
  ...we won't agree ** -- hoothat 03/13/2018 3:43PM
  To be fair -- Beerman 03/13/2018 12:57PM
  I know. There are scary boogeymen everywhere. -- hoolstoptheheels 03/13/2018 1:02PM
  That's not the issue -- Beerman 03/13/2018 12:55PM
  One has to have a mind before one can lose it. ** -- HowieT3 03/13/2018 11:14AM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307