The Soapbox

Joined: 04/30/2006 Posts: 44688
Likes: 60770

What's this?

His judicial philosophy (if you can really call “Originalism” a philosophy

is pretty far from the mainstream, and he will be an aggressive “activist” from the bench. He will prove hostile on issues that matter and will affect tens of millions of lives. He will be quite friendly to large businesses that want to strike down democratically passed laws and regulations as unconstitutional, religious fundamentalists who want to flout the Establishment Clause or regulate people’s reproductive choices and educations to their beliefs, Republicans who want to disenfranchise voters in elections and deregulate campaign finance even further, etc.

No, he doesn’t strike me as a fundamentally bad human being like Donald Trump, but that shouldn’t be the basis for anyone’s objection to him. But there isn’t much the feckless Dems can do at this point. They shit the bed in November 2016.

(In response to this post by Hoos Operator)

Posted: 07/10/2018 at 09:06AM

PREV NEXT REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

It’s a disgrace the disgusting way the Dems are smearing Judge Kavanaugh. -- Hoos Operator 07/09/2018 10:02PM

Roger Stone: Kavanaugh is Deep State’s Pick For Supreme Court -- WahooMatt05 07/10/2018 09:39AM

First time I've looked at info wars. An interesting article on the mass -- HoosWillWin 07/10/2018 12:10PM

Don't sleep on the druids! ** -- Hoodafan 07/10/2018 12:57PM

It's kind of amazing that Alex Jones has the following he does -- WahooMatt05 07/10/2018 12:16PM

No reason for anyone to -- Capital City Hoo 07/10/2018 4:40PM

"We are in for the fight of our lives!!!" Senator Elizabeth Warren D-MA ** -- Tuckahokie 07/10/2018 07:40AM

“He’s hostile to just about everyone.” ** -- Hoos Operator 07/10/2018 08:21AM

His judicial philosophy (if you can really call “Originalism” a philosophy -- WahooRQ 07/10/2018 09:06AM

Agreed, and I'm not sure they can do much about it. -- hoolstoptheheels 07/10/2018 09:31AM

I agree -- Capital City Hoo 07/10/2018 10:15AM

Simpler than that; there was no way a woman was going to get elected right -- Seattle .Hoo 07/10/2018 1:11PM

I think pretty much any competent woman politician other than Hillary -- HoosWillWin 07/10/2018 1:25PM

Yeah? Like who? Warren? Gillenbrand? Tulsi Gabbard? ** -- Seattle .Hoo 07/10/2018 1:30PM

Warren, but I doubt she was the best (though my Dad loves her). But really -- HoosWillWin 07/10/2018 1:51PM

My preference in 2016 was white guy Biden. Maybe I'm the misogynist. ;) But -- Seattle .Hoo 07/10/2018 2:21PM

Yes, I wanted Biden too (back in 2008 also). ** -- HoosWillWin 07/10/2018 2:46PM

His time passed. In 1988. :-) ** -- Hoodafan 07/10/2018 3:07PM

Please, please run him in '20. Not that I think he stands a chance in -- Hoodafan 07/10/2018 2:36PM

Hmm. I wouldn't mind seeing him match up against Trump. Getting a little -- Seattle .Hoo 07/10/2018 2:59PM

1 out of 3 ain't bad. :-) Nikki Haley 2024! ** -- Hoodafan 07/10/2018 1:39PM

My point is that I can't think of a woman who would have won in 2016. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 07/10/2018 1:48PM

Probably not in '16, but not because of the misogyny and other reasons you -- Hoodafan 07/10/2018 2:01PM

I wasn't using them as an example of candidates I'd like to see run. I'm -- Seattle .Hoo 07/10/2018 2:19PM

So it wasn't that "there was no way a woman was going to get elected right -- Hoodafan 07/10/2018 2:31PM

No I still think that is a true statement. I explained why I think that. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 07/10/2018 2:56PM

I'll assume this is TIC cuz someone actually thinking that would be - #Sad! ** -- Hoodafan 07/10/2018 1:14PM

I actually do believe that even given the fact that Hill was a terrible -- Seattle .Hoo 07/10/2018 1:27PM

#Sad! I so wanted Trump to pick Amy Coney Barrett, if only so we could hear -- Hoodafan 07/10/2018 1:38PM

I don't even know what this means. Sorry. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 07/10/2018 1:48PM

The whirling dervish of nonsensical gobbledygook strikes again! ** -- WahooRQ 07/10/2018 1:59PM

Time to step up your trolling game TrollQ. ** -- Hoodafan 07/10/2018 2:32PM

Your posts remind me of when Beavis ate too much sugar and became Cornholio ** -- WahooRQ 07/10/2018 3:31PM

I believe Albright was referring to her own vagina. I'll bet that place -- hooyorkcity 07/10/2018 1:44PM

Ouch, damn dude, that is brutal ** -- VaTechie 07/10/2018 1:58PM

YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!!! ** -- hooyorkcity 07/10/2018 2:00PM

Yep. Elections have consequences. This was lost in Nov, 2016. Now Dems have -- HoosWillWin 07/10/2018 12:18PM

The Dems needn’t worry about “galvanizing Trump’s base” IMHO. The trash -- WahooRQ 07/10/2018 10:14AM

It's over before it begins ** -- WaxHoo 07/10/2018 07:46AM

#winning and lots of it ** -- TomKazanski 07/10/2018 01:30AM

Let the voters decide. ** -- Hoocinogenic 07/10/2018 12:06AM

They have, in landslide fashion. ** -- TomKazanski 07/10/2018 01:03AM

God that is hilarious. Thank you for illustrating so brilliantly. -- Hoocinogenic 07/10/2018 07:14AM

Oh the horror, more babies will live -- TomKazanski 07/10/2018 07:23AM

Are you as fiercely opposed to capital punishment? ** -- Hoocinogenic 07/10/2018 3:47PM

That's a pretty silly question IMO. Are you for unfettered death penalty? -- Hoodafan 07/10/2018 4:06PM

I don't assert the claim that abortion is tantamount to state sanctioned -- Hoocinogenic 07/10/2018 5:29PM

Pretty sure it's not a "net positive" for the kid not allowed to be born. -- Hoodafan 07/10/2018 6:08PM

Equating abortion to murdering an innocent child is misguided Imo. -- Hoocinogenic 07/10/2018 7:17PM

It’s a dern shame they done gone and outlawed the 13 years after pill. Boy -- TomKazanskisMom 07/10/2018 10:42AM

So long as the state government is -- walkthecorner 07/10/2018 09:02AM

How do you expect that to happen? ** -- Faz d. Hoo 07/10/2018 11:34AM

Handmaid has the baby, Commander's family raises it as their own. ** -- WahooRQ 07/10/2018 12:48PM

Exactly ** -- Hoo TV 07/10/2018 11:38AM

ABC news couldn't wait -- HokieDan95 07/09/2018 10:51PM

Just honest, fair, and objective journalism. And proactive to boot! Oh -- Hoodafan 07/10/2018 11:00AM

The only thing "controversial" about Kavanaugh is he was nominated by Trump -- PalmyraHoo 07/10/2018 08:56AM

That’s probably true if you’re talking about personal character issues. -- WahooRQ 07/10/2018 09:13AM

Those are some pretty strong words which I've yet to see any credible -- Hoo23 07/10/2018 10:52AM

That may be the weirdest excuse for an "analysis" I've ever read. Weighing -- WahooRQ 07/10/2018 11:54AM

A few quick points... -- Hoo23 07/10/2018 2:23PM

Wow, substantive legal discussion on the Soapbox! Never thought it was -- WahooRQ 07/10/2018 3:30PM

Excellent discussion WahooRQ...we may not see eye to eye very often -- Hoo23 07/10/2018 4:12PM

Right back atchya, dude. -- WahooRQ 07/10/2018 6:35PM

Many have called Roberts an activist judge, correct? -- PalmyraHoo 07/10/2018 09:49AM

Some idiot Republicans did after he did the opposite of judicial activism -- WahooRQ 07/10/2018 10:16AM

Omg look at their “correction”.....fakenews providers -- TomKazanski 07/10/2018 01:12AM

Yep. Fake News trying to hide their Fake News. -- ryno hoo 07/10/2018 09:31AM

So the McConnell Doctrine was just a one time deal? Got it. ** -- VAGentleman05 07/10/2018 08:25AM

Please, just stop ** -- HokieDan95 07/10/2018 09:33AM

What does that have to with this? ** -- TomKazanski 07/10/2018 08:41AM

That's what you call a smear? #snowflake ** -- VAGentleman05 07/09/2018 11:07PM

You do realize they posted the "controversy" 4 hours b4 the announcement -- CA Cav 07/10/2018 01:29AM

SMH... ** -- hoothat 07/09/2018 11:49PM