...arguing points I did not make. There was nothing secret or clandestine about any of this. The GA Rep governor and Secretary of State "settled" a race card-based lawuit backed by Abrams (whose sister was a judge on one of the election cases, LOL) to weaken election integrity, specifically around mail-in ballots. This is all public record -- there's nothing clandestine about it.

The Dominion issue is a separate matter. I'm not at all saying that I buy into the Powell/Wood allegations, which have not been proven, IMO, but many other people, including many Dems (e.g., Warren, Klobuchar, Wyden), questioned their integrity. As a side note, it's funny now to see the left saying that voting machines are the only electronic device on the planet that absolutely, positively, no-way-in-hell could ever be hacked or corrupted, but whatever.

Neither of these issues -- the Abrams settlement or Dominion -- came to light, broadly speaking, prior to the election because it's just local bullshit politics. Nobody cares about stuff like this until it matters. But when it surfaced after the election, the idiot Reps in charge of allowing it all looked like complete fools, or worse.

As for Occam's razor, I would say it perfectly explains my view, not yours:
-- Dems collaborated to sue in swing states in front of friendly judges to have election integrity measures weakened. Why would they do this?
-- Dem secretaries of state, governors and election officials furthered weakened such measures during the election, backed by Dem-dominated courts. Why would they do this?
-- Post-election all sort of dubious activity took place, including stopping vote counts, counting votes without Republican monitors present (a clear violation of the law), disallowing oversight of counting by monitors (a clear violation of the law) and failing to match signatures or retain envelopes (clear violations of the law). Why would they do this?
-- Any subsequent effort by Trump/Reps to challenge the election was fought tooth and nail by the Dems, thrown out of court before the merits were even heard and/or shouted down as sedition or treason. Why would they do this?

Occam's Razor would say that all of the above would naturally lead one to conclude that the election was stolen, but you're free to try to explain it all away as some other miraculous occurence. One that just so happened to result in razor-thin Biden margins in five different states from "clandestinely" counted ballots tilting 90%+ in his favor with all sorts of statistical anomolies showing that the chances of all of these things happening were about the same as Biden passing a Mensa exam.