What I linked has several mentions of CRT by those looking to implement it (by their definition), whether it be in memorandums, training, or actual slides to kids.
I dont have to make a point of "that it is systematically being taught. " Those are your words not mine. My words are that it is being implemented in VA schools based on the definition of those implementing it.
My question, which seemingly no one can answer, is how can the left say it does not exist when we have memo's within VA education seeking to implement it and slides for kids discussing it?
My follow on comment is not an endorsement or an indictment of the CRT, but rather a statement that we cannot have the needed discussion of whether it has merit in our classrooms, how much, how little, what age, etc until we are at least honest about its existence in the school systems.
You say things like "Shouldn't educators have access to all schools of thought? Or do you want to limit the knowledge of our educators too?" No one is saying a teacher cannot read something...so not sure where you're going or what you're talking about.
Yes, I'm a racist...that's the only conclusion. Yup...if i dont agree with you, then i must be a racist.
Instead of calling me a racist, why dont you actually answer my original question. How can the left and people like you claim CRT does not exist in schools when clearly it's called out over and over again in school memos, slides to kids, teacher training, and state memos? Can you answer that? That's all i'm looking for.