all. Harris had taken an anti-depressant. Paddock had taken a completely different low-grade anti-anxiety medication....quite a stretch to implicate that in a crime he probably planned for months if not years. Beltway snipers, nothing. ISIS attacks, nothing. The list goes on.

Anyways other than your stubborn refusal to ever even begin to admit guns are the main issue, do you have any causal link between any of those shootings and your bullshit description "psychotropic drugs" (which you lump in everything from an opioid to anti-anxiety pills, to anti-depressants, all of which do completely different things)? Of course you don't. The best you can do is make some stupid argument that X,Y, and Z were all taking some form of medication so therefore IT WASNT" THE GUNS IT WAS THE DRUGS!!!!

That's pretty lame, hoakie.

If you want to talk about people with mental problems having access to weapons, sure. The Newtown shooter, the Aurora shooter, and the VPISU shooter all did have that in common. It's a problem that should be addressed. But, of course, you have little interest in addressing it if that means you have to fill out more paperwork to get your precious guns.