No just returning to Matt the same effort he puts into objectivity. He had
no desire for an honest conversation with that question, just confirmation of his pre-determined answer of scenario #1. You can tell by the fact that he's no longer constantly pushing his narratives about weaponizing the justice system, using them to go after political opponents, and POTUS staying independent from the DOJ. Gee, I wonder why he's no longer posting those narratives constantly?
There doesn't seem to be much doubt that was spying going on, and yes against an opposing political party. They've basically admitted that. (the actual scenario 2 rather than the his hyper-partisan depiction) The questions as I see them are how, when and why, and was it signed off on by a judge, because yes, spying on an opposing political party is a very big deal and had damn well be justified before an independent arbiter. Only Mueller and the IG can answer those questions for us. And I trust they will.
|
(
In response to this post by hoolstoptheheels)
Posted: 05/25/2018 at 11:12AM