FWIW, I appreciate the insight. But we'll have to disagree quite a bit on this following point of yours "So, Antifa nor BLM rise anywhere close to these kind of offenses"
And I think that disagreement there, is causing the wedge between our conclusions of what I believe is inconsistent practice. Does that seem fair? We could go back and forth...I could site the burned businesses, people ACTUALLY attacked and hospitalized, and billions of dollars of damage across the nation based on ideological thought and opposition. We could talk about how curfews had to be implemented, whole parts of cities were taken over, police stations taken over and so on and so on. And I would, point blank tell you, that I dont see how given all that, there could be a reluctance on those actions, but not on the movement against school boards. It just strikes me as inconsistent. And while I think I understand your points, I just disagree.
On the Union/CRT piece, it's in curriculums...that's why the Union wants to keep it, not something they haven't done yet. Your last paragraph is just false. That's not even up for dispute. Yo can read the argument of the union if you like.