think they deserved criticism for not letting it go forward when they knew they controlled the Senate and could just vote him down. That's how spineless pols roll and do gamesmanship. But I don't doubt for a second that Harry Reid would've made the exact same argument if roles were reversed.

But TBH I think you guys could've come up with much more deserving examples of GOP obstructionism than that one. The certainly have offered plenty. My only point was that you're being delusional or disingenuous if you think that's just a GOP thing.