We'll just have to disagree but that has nothing to do with my point. In
order for it to pass under reconciliation and 50 votes, it had to stay under that $1.5T static cap. The Dems already showed their partisanship in the House vote without one single yay vote. No way anything could ever get 60 these days in the Senate.
So it's a bit silly to claim what happens in 2027 on the personal side (or comparing it to Corp rates) is why this is so "evil". That had to be done only to satisfy reconciliation rules. But the chances of that actually happening in 2027 are less than nil.
|
(
In response to this post by WahooRQ)
Posted: 11/29/2017 at 1:53PM