Yes .. and, WADR, it continues to lack substance and specificity ..Though
.. I remain more than happy to engage on either, if offered
The uncontroverted contextual truth remains:
1) Human medication
2) Legally and ethically available for off label prescription
3) track record of safety for the prescribed human medication
4) existing body of scientific evidence supporting it's use-- the weight of which evidence you are free to evaluate and judge on your own.. But it does exist and is reasonably extensive..
That's it. That's the short list of "truth"/on this thing. And each and every one of those truths has been obscured or outright denied/ lied about by the media, big pharma, and, sometimes, the government itself. And I got a big big problem with that.
We can argue policy all you want (or, rather, you can.. I'm not planning on sticking around here after lunch).. but the contextual truth regarding ivermectin is summarized in the four points above, and I challenge you or anyone to specifically and substantively demonstrate or document otherwise.. regardless of what you think the policy or healthcare paradigm implications might be.
As always, I appreciate the dialogue
[Post edited by EAPo at 09/28/2021 12:17PM]
|
(
In response to this post by 111Balz)
Posted: 09/28/2021 at 11:58AM