The Soapbox

hoolstoptheheels

Joined: 01/04/2001 Posts: 27049
Likes: 34333


Yeah, in the end, I probably would too.


But the fact that certain states were utilizing that approach is not an argument for a SC decision to impose it on all the other states, if the Constitution does not provide for it.

I don’t believe it provides a right to privacy to individual women or couples to say “this is my view of when life begins”. I think pro-choice folks have to make that case politically in their states.

Again, the most politically pro-choice lawyers I’ve spoken with don’t believe Roe is a valid Constitutional decision. Without exception. I’ve never seen a particularly strong legal argument for it.

And as pro-choice activist lawyers know, Laci Peterson’s law is completely inconsistent with Roe.

(In response to this post by Seattle .Hoo)

Posted: 03/24/2021 at 10:49AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  To me a state's national guard should be this militia -- Oregon Hoo 03/24/2021 11:02AM
  "Originalist" interpretation is a con game. ** -- DanTheFan 03/24/2021 10:36AM
  Dan, you are more succinct than I. Chapeau +1 ** -- Lazarus 03/24/2021 11:02AM
  It’s not like there is no room at all for interpretation. -- hoolstoptheheels 03/24/2021 10:19AM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307