The Soapbox

hoolstoptheheels

Joined: 01/04/2001 Posts: 27049
Likes: 34333


Well, I don’t think I agree with that. We’re a nation of laws,


And the blueprint is the Constitution. 2A governs our gun rights far more than anything else IMO. Laws that restrict gun rights must be found to be consistent with 2A. And I think there are plenty of great arguments for that (like background checks, or even licensing of some sort, and restrictions to assault-style weapons that bear no resemblance to anything in existence in 1790).

But to say that 2A is not an extremely important consideration - I mean, we just experienced a threat to our democracy (in both our views, I’m sure) that spotlights the need for “guardrails”. One of the most important guardrails is making sure our laws are constitutional. Probably the most important.

So IMO, 2A’s relationship to the gun rights debate has never been more important.
[Post edited by hoolstoptheheels at 03/24/2021 10:58AM]

(In response to this post by Seattle .Hoo)

Posted: 03/24/2021 at 10:56AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  To me a state's national guard should be this militia -- Oregon Hoo 03/24/2021 11:02AM
  "Originalist" interpretation is a con game. ** -- DanTheFan 03/24/2021 10:36AM
  Dan, you are more succinct than I. Chapeau +1 ** -- Lazarus 03/24/2021 11:02AM
  It’s not like there is no room at all for interpretation. -- hoolstoptheheels 03/24/2021 10:19AM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307