Again "greater good" and "weakening" as defined by you. I suspect
Libertarians would define both of those very differently.
I certainly don't view the Pauls or other Libertarians as not wanting what they think is for the "greater good" or wanting to "weaken" the country, and find it odd that you and others want to pretend they do. And I certainly don't see reason to paint them with the racist brush, far from it. I just think they go too far to the "purist" version of Libertarian philosophy which I don't think is realistic in a society as large and diverse as ours. And certainly not realistic if they want to garner the support needed to become a valid alternative.
|
(
In response to this post by 111Balz)
Posted: 09/20/2017 at 2:21PM