to do with whether and why the "fake news" theme is sticking with objective minded people? (That was my point Hoooooooo was addressing.) It's sticking because those trying to be objective and using logic can see when they're being fed biased BS be it from Fox or CNN.

But if you insist in trying to shift the focus to Russian interference, that's yet another good example. Most objective people never denied the Russians interfered. They've pointed out that it was 3 or 4 agencies, not the oft repeated claim of 17 agencies (to make it sound more "real"). They've pointed out that "meddled" conveniently never gets defined, and there's a big difference between fake ads/propaganda being put on FB and changing votes/voter rolls (which we have zero evidence happened). They don't argue that it wasn't done to benefit Trump, they point out that without collusion wtf exactly are you blaming for doing or not doing then? And how about what Obama was doing or not doing, since it was his administration in charge at the time after all. And finally, if it was truly about "national security" and the "integrity of our elections", why are we not focusing our efforts on making sure voting machines/voter rolls are protected, and assuring voters why our elections will safe going forward? Maybe because we're too busy trying to find ways to keep the collusion narrative alive and "get Trump", despite seeing virtually no evidence for doing so?