You're losing it, HO Cakes.
You're getting less and less lucid but more hysterical with each post. It's half amusing, the other half concerning.
Just so we're clear:
-we agree no rules were violated, but you still think Booker should be removed from the judicial committee.
-You admit you got the vote counts wrong, but dodged the real question about how Ginsburg and Scalia became SCOTUS nominees. Typical. Neither was controversial and Ginsburg was directly endorsed by Orin Hatch as the moderate Clinton should nominate. Scalia also was voted on while the Dems were using their capital to try and block Rehnquist from being Chief.
-Your response to the next paragraph is just sad.
-LOL at your thinking this is going to cost DEMOCRATS female votes. That might be the most adorably clueless thing you've ever posted.
Finally, I don't like how politicized the SCOTUS has become and have said that repeatedly. I would prefer that there were more of an appetite for Dems and Republicans to work together and nominate actual mainstream judges like they used to. But the Republicans are the ones who blocked and ACTUAL MAINSTREAM JUDGE for a full year and then appointed one extremist then another. This one maybe with a very sketchy past on top of his other red flags. It's fair game to vet him.
[Post edited by WahooRQ at 09/19/2018 1:03PM]
|
(
In response to this post by Hoos Operator)
Posted: 09/19/2018 at 12:58PM